Last week, boxers Conor Benn and Chris Eubank Jr. engaged in behavior reminiscent of Donald Trump’s style to promote their upcoming fight, billed as a family feud, scheduled for April 26th at Tottenham Hotspur Stadium.
In Manchester, Eubank symbolically humiliated Benn by smashing a raw egg on his face, referencing Benn’s claim that excessive egg consumption led to his failed drug tests.
This egg incident sparked a brawl involving promoters Eddie Hearn, Ben Shalom, and the fighters themselves, requiring security to intervene.
Eubank now faces disciplinary action from the British Boxing Board of Control for disreputable conduct, and a significant fine is anticipated.
The fight was initially scheduled for 30 months prior but was postponed due to Benn’s drug test issues.
Concerns were raised about the potential health risks to both fighters.
There was a real possibility of Benn, a welterweight, fighting a significantly heavier super-middleweight.
Benn is notably smaller than Eubank, shorter by three inches and with a five-inch reach disadvantage.
When the fight was initially called off, it was seen as a relief, averting a potentially dangerous mismatch.
Doubts about the fight’s suitability persisted, especially considering Eubank’s required weight cut to 157lb.
This time, the fight is set at a 11st 6lb limit, with Eubank subject to a 170lb rehydration clause.
The fight’s validity remains questionable.
It’s largely seen as a commercial venture, capitalizing on the famous fights between their fathers, Nigel Benn and Chris Eubank Sr., in the 1990s.
While neither son matches their fathers’ skill, a large crowd is still expected in North London next month.
The author questions the concern for boxer safety among ringside attendees, especially when referees intervene to prevent serious injuries.
Maintaining a level playing field is crucial in boxing due to its inherent dangers.
Despite potential financial gains for the fighters, the author expresses a preference for the Benn-Eubank fight not to happen, citing concerns about its premise and potential risks.
